Characterising approaches to steroid therapy in paediatric multisystem inflammatory syndrome temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2.

AIM: We describe approaches to steroid therapy use in paediatric multisystem inflammatory syndrome temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2 (PIMS-TS) and examine the association between steroid therapy and key clinical markers of severity. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of children (<18 years) admitted to a tertiary paediatric hospital in the UK with PIMS-TS. We collected data on if and why steroid therapy was used; the duration, type and dosing of steroids prescribed; and approaches to hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis monitoring, if performed. We examined associations between steroid exposure/total steroid dose (mg/m2 /day) and paediatric intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation and inotropic support. RESULTS: Steroid therapy was commenced in most children (84.9%, n = 104) with a median total daily steroid dose (hydrocortisone equivalent) of 271.0 mg/m2 /day (interquartile range 232.5-355.5) and treatment length of 26.0 days (interquartile range 19.0-32.0). Dosing regimens predominantly involved a short course of high-dose methylprednisolone followed by tapering oral prednisolone. Basal and/or dynamic testing of the HPA axis was conducted in a minority (11.8%, n = 15) and was normal. Duration of steroid therapy correlated positively with durations of paediatric intensive care unit admission (r = 0.407, P < 0.001) and mechanical ventilation (r = 0.797, P < 0.001). A greater proportion of children receiving steroid therapy also received inotropic support compared to those that did not receive steroid therapy (71.4% vs. 45.5%, P = 0.025). CONCLUSION: Prolonged, high-dose steroid therapy is often used in the management of severe PIMS-TS with the potential for HPA axis suppression and should be withdrawn carefully.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is associated with increased severity of presentation of childhood onset type 1 diabetes mellitus: A multi-centre study of the first COVID-19 wave.

OBJECTIVE: Children are usually mildly affected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19). However, the pandemic has caused collateral damage to those with non-COVID-19 diseases. We aimed to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the presentation of newly diagnosed childhood onset type 1 diabetes. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted over a 1-year period. We compared the severity of presentation of new-onset type 1 diabetes in children under the age of 18 presenting to the multi-centre North Central London diabetes network before (1 July 2019 to 22 March 2020) and during (23 March 2020 to 30 June 2020) the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom. RESULTS: Over the 1-year study period, a total of 30 children presented with new-onset type 1 diabetes during the pre-pandemic period and 17 presented during the first COVID-19 wave. Children presented more frequently in diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) during the first COVID-19 wave compared with pre-pandemic (pre-pandemic: mild 13%, moderate 6.7%, severe 10%; first COVID-19 wave: mild 5.9%, moderate 24%, severe 47%; p = 0.002). During the first COVID-19 wave, DKA presentations in children with a family history of type 1 diabetes were fewer compared to those without a family history (33.3% vs. 100.0%; p = 0.006). Children presenting in severe DKA pre-pandemic were younger than those not in severe DKA (3.9 years vs. 12.2 years, p < 0.001) but this difference was not significant during the first COVID-19 wave (10.1 years vs. 11.2 years, p = 0.568). Presenting HbA1c measurement was higher in those presenting during the first COVID-19 wave (13.0 ± 1.7 vs. 10.4 ± 3.2%; 119 ± 19 vs. 90 ± 35 mmol/mol; p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic is associated with increased severity of presentation of childhood onset type 1 diabetes. Whatever the context, young people with suspected new-onset type 1 diabetes should be referred for urgent clinical review.